Koumae Phd
評価: 0+x
wallflowerSCP.jpg

████年7月██日に撮影されたSCP-1205

アイテム番号: SCP-1205

オブジェクトクラス: Safe

特別収容プロトコル: SCP-1205は監視カメラが設置された窓がなく光量の少ない収容セルに収容されます。月に一度大気質が検査され、カビが発生しないように大気が調節されます。

Personnel monitoring the live surveillance will be alerted by an alarm, in the event of any change in the object's size or shape; observation of the live video feed itself is discouraged, until more information on Incident 1205-G███ is available.

概要: SCP-1205は花柄の壁紙が壁の破片に張り付いたままの朽ちた破片のように見えます。その壁紙は経年で色が落ち、(炎や化学薬品による)燃焼に対して脆弱なように思われます。Subjects instructed to intentionally damage the item reported hearing a sustained shriek, as if from a far distance, reminiscent of the ascending pitch of tea kettle's whistle.

Within twenty-four hours, any portions of paper destroyed will re-appear on the wall in their former location and in identical condition. Fragments removed by cutting or tearing inevitably crumble into a fine dust within minutes, reappearing after the same twenty-four hour period. The item has also been observed to change shape and size at irregular intervals. These changes have never added or subtracted more than six square centimeters from the object's approximate surface area.

Under experiment conditions, interaction with the object has not been observed to produce any psychological, physical or other damages, short or long-term. However, controversy surrounding Incident 1205-G███ suggests that further testing for perception-altering influences is necessary.

SCP-1205に割り当てられた全ての職員はインシデントレポート 1205-C███を読む必要があります。

注意: 以下のファイルにはE███ G███博士の個人的なメモや日誌からの引用が含まれており、財団スタッフと家族への言及は全て検閲されています。目撃者によって???されたG███博士による事件の記述は状況に応じて注釈が付けられています。

補遺 ████年7月██日: While performing air-quality tests in the containment cell, a junior researcher claimed to witness the following—
"I'd just finished up… and I know it isn't a known issue, but I felt weird turning my back on it. So I backed out of the room, keeping an eye on it— and then I saw it move. It was like a little seam appeared in one corner, and a little scrap of it quivered, like someone was trying to tear it off. It pulled free and fluttered to the ground, but I must have blinked. When I looked again, it was gone."

補遺 2: An anonymous Foundation researcher notes that he/she has read both the incident report and Dr. G███’s original documents several times, and thoroughly. It is his/her opinion that sections of writing have since disappeared from the handwritten originals. This claim is disputed by other researchers.